List About Books Still Life with Woodpecker
| Title | : | Still Life with Woodpecker |
| Author | : | Tom Robbins |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 288 pages |
| Published | : | April 9th 2001 by No Exit Press (first published October 1980) |
| Categories | : | Fiction. Humor. Literature. Novels. Contemporary. Magical Realism. Classics |
Tom Robbins
Paperback | Pages: 288 pages Rating: 4.05 | 69077 Users | 2728 Reviews
Interpretation Conducive To Books Still Life with Woodpecker
Still Life with Woodpecker is a sort of a love story that takes place inside a pack of Camel cigarettes. It reveals the purpose of the moon, explains the difference between criminals and outlaws, examines the conflict between social activism and romantic individualism, and paints a portrait of contemporary society that includes powerful Arabs, exiled royalty, and pregnant cheerleaders. It also deals with the problem of redheads.Details Books In Favor Of Still Life with Woodpecker
| Original Title: | Still Life with Woodpecker |
| ISBN: | 184243022X (ISBN13: 9781842430224) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Setting: | Hawaii(United States) Seattle, Washington(United States) |
Rating About Books Still Life with Woodpecker
Ratings: 4.05 From 69077 Users | 2728 ReviewsAssess About Books Still Life with Woodpecker
I've been trying to think of how to review this book, but the only things that come to mind are metaphors for other senses... it's hue saturation is high, and it's gritty, bluesey and edgy the way Led Zeppelin is Metal. The plot tends towards the absurd, which allows the story to perform some philosophical acrobatics without giving into the pedantic or pretentious. Robbins tends to express these sorts of things in dichotomy: outlaws as opposed to criminals, activism as opposed to idealism, ideasLet me first tell you that I dislike modern jazz. You know the type: the free-form kind that only musicians can appreciate. I dislike it because it abandons all the structural qualities that I find appealing about old-fashioned jazz and is all about technical skill. What does this have to do with this book? The comparison came to me early on in reading this book which I begrudgingly forced myself to finish: I liken modern jazz to watching a performer masturbate musically on stage, getting off on
I learned that if you have red hair you can write a crappy book and people will love it. I could have written this book in college. The jokes were forced, the premise was too ridiculous to take seriously, and the payoff was weak, weak, weak. It was little more than a sophmoric creative writing assignment taken, like, way too far. Plus if you can't write female characters to be anything more then complex sexual fantasies you should just not even try. I got the sense that the lengthy passages
It has been a long time since I read this, but I do know is that I loved it.
Oh my goodness gracious where to begin with this one? This thing was nuts, absolutely crazy ... or was it! I dont know. It confused me, befuddled me, induced laughter and suppressed snickers at inopportune moments, made me cringe and blush at its crudeness and lewdness (over the years Ive heard tons of street slang describing human genitalia but never before have I heard a vagina referred to as peachfish or peachclam), pushed me to reconsider 1970s U.S. history, conjured up images of Patty
I remember over the years, I would come across Still Life with Woodpecker every now and then in bookshops and book bazaars. Each time, I would take it in my hands, read the backcover and put it back on the shelve. I don't know why, although it seemed interesting to me, something always stopped me from buying it. Of course I was aware of all the praise about it but that is never enough for me to want to read a book.I think I get why it became such a big success all over the world. Its romantic
The ninth book I read on my commute in 2007. I read this right after Ulysses, as kind of a palate-cleanser, since Tom Robbins is pretty far from James Joyce. But I kept thinking as I read this one about how both it and Ulysses were so very much products of their respective times - Ulysses of Ireland in the 1930s, and Still Life with Woodpecker of the U.S. in the 1970s.The example that amused me the most is that, in SLWW, a certain famous figure is held up with great reverence and love ... and
0 Comments